FSSI
is a subsidiary of Arctic Slope Regional Corporation (ASRC).
We are a full service Base Operations and Maintenance Support
Contractor with offices in both Anchorage, Alaska and Greenbelt,
Maryland serving clients nationwide. FSSI is but one of several
ASRC 8(a) companies that have combined our staffing and financial
resources under Arctic Slope Federal Holding Company in an effort
to reduce personnel layering and overhead cost.
Our executive level staff has more than 200 years of Base Operations,
Logistics and Environment support experience.
|
 |
Many agencies
are faced with the mandate of doing an A-76 study. FSSI prefers
to market the Direct Conversion Award instead, which relies
on FSSI's well-developed partnering process with the agency.
The authority for this comes from OMB A-76 Direct Conversion
Award Policy, paragraph 8, Update XI
A Commander may nominate an activity for Direct Conversion
Award from in-house to contract performance if the Activity
is performed exclusively by military personnel and performed
by 10 or less civilians or a combination of any number of
military and 10 or less civilians
Before any action is taken, one of the following methods
must be used to justify the cost effectiveness of Direct Conversion
award:
Method
1:
Market Analysis
Government develops an estimated cost of contract performance
using market analysis procedures and compares it to the cost
of existing in-house performance.
|
Method 2:
Solicitation for Proposal
Government requests a proposal from the contractor and compares
the cost to the cost of in-house performance |
Direct Conversion Award Can Begin
Immediately Upon Approval
A Collaborative Process for Cost Savings
There are a multitude of advantages to the government to
direct conversion award with FSSI, foremost is the elimination
of 2 years of uncertainty, and low employee morale while the
A-76 study is being conducted of the Direct Conversion process
incumbents can get on with their life and their job, supporting
the mission of the base. The most important advantage of the
Direct Conversion Award process is the fairer treatment of
incumbent employees:
- Wages and benefits can be negotiated, vs. SCA wage determination
rates
- Incumbents are kept informed and become part of the process
and transition
- Retention of key personnel more possible
- Contingent offers to incumbents possible
- Upon decision to Direct Convert, contractor can brief
incumbents on company and intent
- Interview process can start immediately
- Job offers made contingent upon contract award
The table below illustrates the comparison between an A-76
procurement, A-76 in-house procurement, and Direct Conversion
Award:
Under Direct Conversion Award, incumbents stay focused on
their jobs. Contractors are more able to retain the talented
and skilled employees, usually lost under the long and arduous
A-76 competition
For the government, contractor protests are eliminated. In
partnering with the government, the Statement of Work is developed
in concert with the sharing of ideas to enhance and clarify
contract intent. Federal dollars are saved when the SOW is
agreed upon prior to price negotiations and contract award.
| Duration |
18-36 Months |
18-36 Months |
5 Months |
| Level of Effort |
Significant |
Significant |
Moderate |
| |
• MEO Development
• RFP Development
• Source Selection
• Appeals |
• MEO Development
• RFP Development
• Source Selection
• Appeals |
• Statement of Work
• Negotiated Price
• Negotiated Contract
• No Protest |
| Performance |
• Based on RFP
• Rqmt Based |
• Reduced Current Ops |
• Based on Collaborative SOW Effort
• Performance Based |
Personnel
Impact |
36% Reduction |
30% Reduction |
• Negotiated
• Staffed to Meet Negotiated SOW
and A-76 Savings
Goals |
| Employee Compensation |
• SCA Wage Rates |
• GOV. Work Wages |
• Competitive Rates
• Performance Based |
|